Poopie

So my concentration is paintings of close up images of cars. I am probably going to go start using closer images of them cars so it'll look a little more abstract and less like the car itself.

Weiner.

Weiner. Well my sponsor person was absent from the City for the weekend and I didn't want to be annoying and ask why so I didn't... Anyway I left the picture and a note on her door and she'll get it tomorrow when she gets back dawg.

Concentration

So my concentration is close up images of motorised vehicles like cars and trainsssss.
And it is coming along fine. I just am procrastinating too much but it's fine, don't worry about it.

It's upside down. Sucks.

 

Ogle Winston Link

Ogle Winston Link http://www.hartmanfineart.net/artist/gallery/120/2/bio/

I was still on this padaoregon.org and them somehow ended up on Charles A. Hartman Fine Art and came across Ogle.

Well, his underlying idea is taking photographs but each one has something relating to a train. It's actually kind of cool since they have so much movement and machinery but the smoke makes the picture. Actually, it is cool. There's little trains hidden everywhere. Sahhh cayute.

But yeah, that's how he's unique. Ogle. Ha. I'm diggin his name, but yes him and his little trains is just precious but they're not sudden or the main focus of the picture. It's chill.

He doesn't necesarily follow the elements and principals of art. He uses value and form in most of his pictures but other than that, yeah he doens't use much. Acutally he deals a lot with movement which is cool.

Jeffrey Conley

Jeffery Conley http://www.hartmanfineart.net/artist/gallery/145/1/bio/

Woah. I actually think this artist is really sick. Ah. It's nice. But I was creating my journey from padaoregon.org and clicked a bunch of random links and found his. I actually can't get over his pictures. They're so sick.

His works are created from his adventures across the world. He basically just takes pictures but somehow they turn out amazing. According to his biography thing, the subject matter in his work is diverse, from small, intimate and delicate, to the grand and dramatic. The weather is used really well in his pictures and I think that's what distincts them from everything else.

So his works are just so great that yes they're great. But he just sees stuff that people don't and changes angles to create a whole new image. Also, he doesn't have any color in his pictures but they're still full of life and colorful. It's trippy.

So his elements and whatnots used are kinda just everything. But if you would like a list of them, I would say he uses color and rhythm and pattern and movement and balance and value and contrast and basically everything...

HERE. Gaze. It's nice. I can't pick three. He's too brilliant.
     

Julia Mangold

Julia Mangold http://www.elizabethleach.com/Exhibit_Detail.cfm?ShowsID=224

Well I was on padaoregon.org and then transfered Elizabeth Leach Gallery where I was browsing and discovered Julia Mangold.

The underlying idea of her art is to explore shape, form and materiality and transform them into sculpures.

Her work is dull in a way but always is different. It's has more to it as it shows weight from her shapes and form. Typically, her works are pretty simple but go beyond simplicity and deal with more.

She kind of bases her art off the elements and priciples of art since her "concentration" so to speak is based on shape and form and she deals' with textures and color as well.

  

Yeee

Not gonna lie, taking 1,000 pictures was kinda awful. Kinda really awful. But tis okey since I finished... at the last minute maybe. But still, I finished. Anywho, I'm told to post pictures? Well here. Enjoy my photo taking excellence.

Sahhh Cute.

 Trew Love.

Precious